Every music educator has a drum that they beat day in and
day out. Not the literal drum, as many of us are simply not gifted in the
percussive arts. (If you're like me, hopefully you've avoided having your
inadequacies caught on tape - pray you keep it that way). The ceaseless
campaigning I am talking about boils down to our central mission as a teacher -
the undercurrent that guides, nuances, and directs our efforts in what we do.
For some it might be musicianship, others it might be precision, others still
might champion facility and technical prowess. All of these are hugely valid,
as they are all essential aspects of music-making and should be expected of
every student on whatever level they personally can achieve.
My personal drum - my dharma, if you will forgive the phrase
being altered slightly - is a student's individual responsibility to the
greater process and product they participate in. To put it a different way: I
want every student to understand how they fit in to what we do, I want enable
them to contribute at their highest level, and I want them to see a process by
which they can replicate these results at a higher level of achievement the
next time they undertake said task. Yes, I know - I expect this out of
15-year-olds who have trouble remembering if they are wearing socks without
looking. I have grey hair for a reason.
One of the tools I have found over the years to help develop
this mindset is a relatively simple conceptual tool you can use with your students daily. It's something that
is simple enough that even the most elementary musician could explain the
bullet points to you, but allows for enough depth that even upper-level
students will continually discover new aspects and layers within it.
Level one
This is the awareness of the sounds and
contribution that are being created within the student themselves. Whether good
or bad, the road to improvement starts with an objective awareness of what we
are doing. Good sound, bad sound, accuracy, or complete musical farce - our
students must be able to recognize what they are creating. To get this point
across, a good axiom to reinforce is that students should "always have an
opinion" about what they just did. Make the students back up their opinion
(which will invariably start out as
"good" or "bad", if not "I don't know")
with an example ("my sound wasn't good because it moved around" or
"I didn't like that because the fast part sounded muddy").
When your students start
listening to themselves actively, you will notice a dramatic improvement in the
overall quality of your band sound.
Level two
This is the awareness of what the surrounding
musicians are doing. Matching and fitting your contribution to your neighbors
further amplifies both efforts, as well as presents a more professional and
polished product to the audience. This level of awareness helps to train the
students to further refine their performance through comparison to their
neighbors. This can apply to dynamics, style, musical line, and any other
aspect of performance or interpretation you can think of. A good goal for
students here is to "match their trio" - trio being the students on
either side of them, as well as themselves. These levels of awareness are an
additive process, and always come back to their basis in the first level of
awareness.
Once level two is achieved on
a high level, you will start to notice marked gains in the clarity of your
ensemble sound. This can take on both positive and negative manifestations, as
you will hear both the good and bad of your student's performance with equal
ease. Identify these and work with your students to further refine the skill of
matching - the mistakes will decrease over time. Patience is key.
Level three
The awareness of what the entire group
is doing during a piece of music. Students operating at this level can aurally
identify the constituent parts of a piece of music and prioritize their
contribution based upon their interaction with these important parts. This
level does require a considerable amount of detail work on the part of the
ensemble and its director, but the results that are achieved through this
attention to detail are quite stunning.
Students that achieve level
three awareness on a high level produce results that are unmistakable in their
quality, clarity, musicality, and nuance. If your ensemble can truly operate at
this level the majority of the time you are truly somewhere special! Enjoy and
submit an entry for the Midwest Clinic, National Concert Band Festival, or TMEA
Honor Band - others need to hear what you are doing!
These levels or awareness are dependent, however, on two
items being completely committed to the skill of matching and its development:
The Students (the aforementioned 15-year-old, organizationally-challenged
children), and The Director. On both group's parts there must be patience and
trust - this process, actively and diligently pursued, creates results that are
second to none. It can be a challenging process, but the growing pains you and
your ensemble undergo are well worth it if you stay the course.
Author
Cory Meals
Bio
Cory Meals currently serves as the Director of Bands for Waller HS, northwest of Houston, TX. While there ensembles under his direction have consistently earned high honors, including numerous Superior ratings, advancement to the UIL State Marching Contest, and the coveted UIL Sweepstakes Award. He has previously held instructional positions in Klein ISD (TX), Keller ISD (TX), and with the Cavaliers Drum and Bugle Corps. He is also an award-winning visual designer whose drill has been performed throughout the southwestern United States. He holds a Bachelor's Degree in Music Education from VanderCook College of Music (IL) where he studied under Dr. Charles Menghini. Throughout his career he has additionally worked with many musical and visual master-teachers such as Mitch Rogers, David Bertman, and Eddie Green. He currently resides with his wife Sarah and their dog Norah in Houston, Texas.